LINKED COMMENT on Thanks for the enlightenment buddy. You got a new subscriber. The truth has to be told.
“Maria, who asked us not to use her last name, had a view of the World Trade Center from her New Jersey apartment building. She remembers a neighbor calling her shortly after the first plane hit the towers. She grabbed her binoculars and watched the destruction unfolding in lower Manhattan. But as she watched the disaster, something else caught her eye.
Maria says she saw three young men kneeling on the roof of a white van in the parking lot of her apartment building. “They seemed to be taking a movie,” Maria said.
The men were taking video or photos of themselves with the World Trade Center burning in the background, she said. What struck Maria were the expressions on the men’s faces. “They were like happy, you know … They didn’t look shocked to me. I thought it was very strange,” she said.” http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=123885
Did the woman with the binoculars “know beforehand?” Of course not. She went to her window to see the damage and fire from the first plane that hit the WTC. That is what the 5 guys were doing, looking at the WTC after the first impact and video taping it and celebrating.
The witness did not say she saw them BEFORE the first impact. It is disgusting that these Israelis were celebrating as Americans were dying and the mainstream media kept that info from the public for 6 months.
The celebrating Israelis spotted in N.J. were obnoxious jerks. CELEBRATING and MOCKING the tragedy was disgustingly selfish. The witness who spotted them saw them after she got a call from a friend who called to tell her that a plane had hit the twin towers so she got her binoculars and went to her window to look for herself. It is after that that she spotted them and I guess called police. The FBI called them the “hi-fivers” from what I have read.
Instead of telling cops that they were celebrating the attacks as they took pictures of themselves with the burning towers behind them, they told the cops they were “documenting the event.” (I think if they threw it in the cops faces saying, yeah, we were celebrating, they might have gotten a beating so they tried to class it up and act like they were not being disrespectful)
What they “admitted” was just their spin trying to class up what they were doing which was celebrating the attack. Do you really think it is odd that they wouldn’t want to admit to the world that they are jerks?
These jerks were mocking our misery, holding up lit lighters and giving each other hi-fives. How the hell does that in your mind become an intelligence mission on their part is beyond me. What kind of clowns are they, and you don’t have seem to get that their location was across the river and not such a great place to video tape the attack, and what in the world would be the need to “document” it? You can’t be serious to think that an intel agency would “do” and attack AND feel the need to “document it” by making a stupid video or taking stupid pictures of themselves with the towers burning in the background from across the river. WHAT THE HELL WOULD A SECRET INTEL AGENCY NEED WITH SUCH A VIDEO “DOCUMENTATION”? Do you really think intel agencies wouldn’t know there would be plenty of video of the attack (as if it would be needed)? Do you really not get the fact that many people that day turned their cameras to the towers in order to capture the traumatic event and document it? Those that claim they were there before the 1st crash have simply relied of FOX NEWS misreporting what the NYT said. the NYT report they used as their source and it doesn’t say what they claim. you have been mislead by Mike Rivero’s “what really happened” and Fox News, if you look at the source it DOESN’T say they were there before the 1st plane hit.
They were in NEW JERSEY, across the river and din’t have that great of a view to take pictures compared to other locations. I have already explained that like many other people they heard of the crash and went to look and take pictures. I already explained that they were obnoxious jerks. Yes, it was wrong for them to celebrate, I have said that many times but when you concoct irrational theories you undermine efforts to criticize them for doing that. Mike omit has poor reasoning skill if he thinks anytime someone documents an even it means that they had to have prior knowledge. You have such a reckless and illogical approach to this it is extremely frustrating. You totally miss the point that the 9/11 Commission downplayed and nearly excluded even mentioning the main motive for the attack. You are oblivious to the fact that the multiple mentions of Israel got omitted from the Staff report when it came time to put it into the 9/11 Report: I have shown that key culprits who planted the seeds of the conspiracy BS you embrace were some of the very same people who suppressed reporting of the main motive (anger at US support of Israel) see “The 9/11 misdirection away from “WHY” and to “HOW”http://representativepress.blogspot.com/2013/09/the-911-misdirection-away-from-why-and.html and see the video:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bzYM9ZnWsnk&list=PLfrlsC1yJ2dSj5VnIejFk0wZEIiEwOGYM
“There was a BOLO, which is a ‘Be On the Look Out’ for a particular van,
perhaps loaded with explosives,” explained DeCarlo, “that may have been on its way to
destroy the George Washington Bridge.”
So cops thought there were explosives BEFORE they pulled the van over, (that is an important point to understand as far as why their was confusion about the van)
Rivero publishes on his website “Police also told the Bergen Record that bomb sniffing dogs were brought to the van and that they reacted as if they had smelled explosives” YET (and this is the important part, please pay attention) Rivero OMITS the the part of the article which says “The Bergen County Police bomb squad X-rayed packages found inside the van but did not find any explosives, authorities said.”
Do you understand that? The source Rivero uses to make the claim that explosives were found didn’t say that! You can check for yourself. Rivero has selectively quoted from the article and has mislead his readers by neglecting to tell them that the very same article he is quoting from said the van was tested AND NO EXPLOSIVES WERE FOUND.
AND BEFORE the cops even pulled the van over, they were under the impression there was explosives or might be explosives in the van. The cops were very agitated by the time they pulled the van over (the suspects were described (accurately) as being happy about the terrorists attack! Dog reacted BUT when they tested for explosives, they found none. Mike Rivero uses the same article saying no explosives were found, quotes only the part saying dogs reacted as if there were! It is very easy to see how dogs could give a false indication under such stressful conditions (probably one of the most stressful times fro the dog handler in his career since 9/11 was so traumatic. It is easy to see how stress, confusion, mixed signals. wanting to please, something like that could lead to a dog making a mistake. Dogs aren’t machines and yes, I checked, they do make mistakes sometimes.
please watch these videos which explain what 9/11 was really about: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQiUXc_aMoo&list=PLfrlsC1yJ2dRvbLQc9Mv_OBnjgqQA-gEr